It has been greater than 13 years because the finish of the final main America’s Cup litigation in 2010. Regrettably, the world’s oldest ongoing worldwide sport remains to be but to get well from the consequences of that litigation with fewer rivals competing for the Cup since. Is there a greater strategy to resolve competitor disputes when there aren’t any agreements in place to arbitrate, with out the chance of once more damaging this historic sport? The Deed of Present governing the competitors, with out evaluation or argument has been assumed by litigants and the New York courts, to create a New York-based charitable belief. The vast majority of the New York Court docket of Appeals of their Mercury Bay judgment of 1990 questioned this characterisation in a short footnote, however since then the New York courts have continued to depend on the identical assumption, based on the bulk, just because “none [of the Mercury Bay] of the litigants have raised it”. This paper evaluations the Deed and finds it affected by authorized deficiencies that maybe name into query the Deed’s standing as a authorized doc and as a charitable belief. These deficiencies additionally increase the query of whether or not the mid-nineteenth century Donors of the Cup had authorized intent however maybe meant a gents’s settlement, binding solely in honour, quite than at legislation to be enforced within the civil courts? The paper additionally explores how the Donors meant competitor disputes are to be resolved and finds that there’s a dispute decision provision hidden inside the phrases of the Deed, which is prone to be in one of the best pursuits of the game, if it had been to be to utilized, instead of litigation in a courtroom.